|
|
 |
|
| JPED |
|
 |
 |
| |
|
Volume 14, Number 1
Summer 2000
(Back to main JPED page)
From the Editors
Charles A. Hughes and Anna H. Gajar
Services for Postsecondary Students with
Disabilities: A Historical Perspective
Joseph W. Madaus
Abstract: Offices for Students with Disabilities
(OSD) at colleges and universities in the United States have under
gone dramatic change over the past 50 years. The current state
of OSD programming is the result of major societal events and
attitudes, legislative involvement by the federal and state governments,
and efforts by many student advocates who realized that students
with disabilities could compete successfully at the college level.
The present article traces the development of OSD programs over
the past 50 years, with consideration given to critical issues
of each era. Such reflection may provide insight into the current
status of programs and services and serve as a foundation for
consideration of how programs might evolve in the next 20 years.
Foreign Language Learning: A Process for Broadening
Access
for Students with Learning Disabilities
Sally S. Scott and Elaine Manglitz
Using Processing Speed Tests to Predict
the Benefit of Extended Test Time for University Students with
Learning Disabilities
Nicole S. Ofiesh, Providence College
Abstract: The present study examined the relationship
between processing speed and the accommodation of extended test
time for university students with learning disabilities (LD).
At present most accommodation decisions are based on the student’s
LD documentation, though there has been little research which
supports the relationship between specific tests and accommodations.
In order to evaluate the predictive capability of three processing
speed tests frequently included in the psychoeducational reports
of students with LD, a logistic regression analysis was used to
predict the probability of benefit from the accommodation of extended
test time. In keeping with previous research, the Nelson Denny
Reading Test (NDRT) was used as a measure of test performance
for the controlled time and extended time test conditions. Participants
were 30 university students with LD and 30 university students
without learning disabilities (NLD) from a large research university
in the East. Results showed that students with LD perform significantly
lower on processing speed tests than NLD students, and when compared
to NLD students, derived greater benefit from the extended time
test condition on the NDRT. The Visual Matching and Cross Out
processing speed tests from the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive
Ability-Revised were significantly correlated with the benefit
of the extended time condition, and the Digit Symbol subtest from
the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised was not. Of those
students in the LD sample who benefited, 90% were correctly classified
as likely to benefit.
Tech Talk: Screen Reader Technology for
Postsecondary Studetns with Disabilities
David McNaughton and Linda Sudlesky
Summary: As reading demands and computer use
increase on college campuses, screen reader technology has an
important role to play for individuals who have difficulty with
reading print materials.
Main JPED page
top of page
|