1.01: Access vs. Compliance in the Physical/Built Environment
Gabriel Merrell, Oregon State University
Jennifer Murchison, Murchison Consulting
Location: Windows (I.M. Pei Building, Second Level)
A big challenge when it comes to the work we do is explaining the differences between “compliant” versus “accessible." The presenters will define the somewhat abstract concept of "program access" and talk through the opportunities and challenges of the major aspects of your college’s physical environment, including department offices, classrooms, events, and programs, with a focus on how to create systemic opportunities to improve accessibility. Many times, particularly when it comes to facilities, we may be told something is “compliant” and doesn’t need to be adjusted, even in the design stage. By learning the differences using abstract and concrete examples, participants will discuss and come away with ideas to advocate for more flexibility and creativity in designing for access and inclusion, not just compliance. The session will define how to work with partners within the institution, to gain and use relational power to prioritize efforts to maximize institutional change.
1.02: Transformative Tech: Navigating Emerging Technology Trends on Campus as a Disability Professional
Rachel Kruzel, Texthelp
Location: Director's Row E (Plaza Building, Lobby Level)
Disability Resource staff do not work in a vacuum. We are part of a bigger ecosystem in our institution. As technology continues its influence as a central part of our lives, it’s essential that we know the technology topics campus leaders are focused on. Having this wider knowledge is key given the impact assistive technology can have on individuals with disabilities while coinciding with efforts around digital accessibility. This session will discuss the key topics campuses are focused on related to technology. We’ll grapple with topics such as digital transformation, online and hybrid learning, data-driven decision making, and AI, amongst other timely topics your campus is focused on. We’ll apply our learnings to the fields of assistive technology, providing tangible examples for application and understanding. Newbies and seasoned professionals curious about technology will leave with key takeaways to prepare them to be a more integrated member of the campus community.
1.03: Determining and Implementing Clinical Accommodations: Strengthening Confidence as a Health Science Disability Professional
Matthew Sullivan Ph.D., Washington University in St. Louis
Grace Clifford MA. Ed., David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Kathleen Mullins MSW, Northwestern University
Location: Governor's Square 15 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
Health science programs present complex learning environments with distinct access challenges. This interactive session will explore effective strategies for implementing disability accommodations across didactic instruction, lab-based learning, and clinical placements. Participants will gain a foundational understanding of key legal frameworks, including the ADA and Section 504, and learn how to evaluate and revise technical standards and policy language to promote access and inclusion—without compromising program integrity. Using real-world case scenarios and group activities, attendees will develop practical strategies and communication tools to support students with disabilities from enrollment through clinical experiences. Participants will leave equipped tools to navigate institutional barriers and build collaborative partnerships among disability services, faculty, and clinical sites—advancing equal access while maintaining essential program standards.
1.04: Shared Responsibility: Fostering Student Accountability within Accommodations in Higher Education
Mandie Greiwe, Purdue University
Scott Howland, University of Notre Dame
Location: Grand Ballroom (I.M. Pei Tower, Second Floor)
This session explores how fostering a culture of accountability enhances disability accommodations in higher education, with an emphasis on empowering students to actively engage in their roles. Recognizing that students bring diverse backgrounds and understanding of responsibility, we’ll discuss strategies to help them navigate the accommodation process, understand their responsibilities, and communicate effectively. Participants will learn best practices for establishing clear expectations, fostering open communication, and distinguishing between student advocacy and activism. The session will also address common barriers—such as reluctance, misunderstandings, and procedural inconsistencies—and offer solutions for building a supportive, collaborative environment across campus. The presentation includes best practices for disability resource professionals across varied institutional settings—from small liberal arts colleges to large research universities - while accounting for unique aspects of campus culture that influence accessibility.
1.05: The "Hot Mess of Harmfulness": How Imposter Phenomenon Thwarts High-Achieving Professionals/Teams
Margaret Camp MEd, Clemson University
Katie Krieger MA, CAGS, UNC Wilmington
Location: Governor's Square 16 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
Over 70% of people report experiencing ‘imposter syndrome’ at some point in their careers. Occurring when high-achieving professionals have distorted, negative self-perceptions that affect productivity and performance, it is most commonly seen in highly-intelligent, driven individuals with challenging jobs in fast-paced environments. In recent years our workplaces have become frenzied with increases in accommodation requests that are more urgent and nuanced than ever before. We have seen stress levels increase and coping skills decrease, alongside waves of angry parents, insistent administrators, faculty pushed to their limits, and high levels of staff burnout and demoralization. Amidst the swirling challenges of an increasingly difficult career, it is common for leaders to identify imposter syndrome in themselves and their staff. We will explore signs of imposter syndrome, 5 different types of imposter syndrome, proven methods to combat it, and how to use it as a competitive advantage to motivate ourselves and our teams.
1.06: Dual Enrollment: Parents, Pitfalls, and Processes
Meri Faulkner M.A., Spartanburg Community College
Teressa Eastman M.B.A., Butler Community College
Michelle Mitchell M.Ed., CRC, Lehigh Carbon Community College
Location: Plaza Court 4 + 5 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
As the landscape of higher education continues to evolve, dual enrollment programs have gained popularity, particularly in community colleges and two-year institutions. However, these programs come with unique challenges and concerns, particularly for parents navigating the transition. This interactive session will explore the complexities of dual enrollment, focusing on parental perspectives, confidentiality issues, and the legal frameworks governing these programs. Key topics will include understanding dual enrollment vs. concurrent enrollment, legal frameworks (IDEA, ADA), confidentiality and FERPA, courses taken in the high school vs. courses on the college campus, the process of identifying dual enrollment students, and modification vs. accommodation. Participants will engage in discussions and activities designed to enhance understanding and identify best practices for supporting students and families and dual enrollment contexts.
1.07: Neurodiversity Means Belonging: Coaching, Advising, and Mentorship for Access and Equity
Teal Van Dyck, Hampshire College
William Syldor-Severino M.Ed, Hampshire College
Griffin Leistinger M.P.P.A., Hampshire College, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Parker Farthing M.Ed., Hampshire College
Location: Governor's Square 14 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
As accessibility services and academic support professionals, we often encounter students navigating vulnerable moments of growth and challenge. When talking with neurodivergent students, our responses can mean the difference between developing long-lasting relationships of trust or becoming another person that “just doesn’t get it”. Join us for a conversation between practitioners, researchers, and advisors about neurodiversity-affirming and trauma-responsive coaching, advising, and mentorship practices. During our time together, we will draw on critical disability studies, disability justice, and transformative justice frameworks to deepen our understanding of what it means to be a neurodivergent and/or neuroqueer student living in a world that was not built with you in mind. Together, we’ll strategize about bringing the work home through an expanded toolkit for consulting with colleagues and supporting student access beyond assimilation.
1.08: Students Transferring from 2-Year to 4-Year Institutions: How Three States are Smoothing the Process
Bree Callahan M.Ed., University of Washington
Kaela Parks, Portland Community College
Edina Rutland, San Jose City College
Mary Lee Vance Ph.D., California State University, Sacramento
Jennifer Billeci, University of California, Davis
Location: Director's Row J (Plaza Building, Lobby Level)
Transition from 2-year to 4-year educational institutions can be full of surprises, both for the students themselves, and for disability resource personnel and faculty. There can be jarring moments as students navigate substantial differences in institutional cultures and processes for requesting accommodations, no matter which state the institutions are in, but there can also be differences in how the transition process feels based on state-specific rules and practices. In this three-part session, participants will hear about what transition looks like in California, Oregon, and Washington. The California presenters will share information related to statewide efforts, while the Oregon and Washington presenters will share observations from their vantage points at large institutions. The session will conclude by inviting contributions from attendees who have experience in other states and at smaller institutions, and the discussion will prompt reflection on practices that can best support students in thriving throughout their educational journeys.
1.09: Lessons From the Field - The Practitioner Year in Review
Ian Kunkes Ed.D, EdPros, LLC
Spencer Scruggs M.S., The University of California, Los Angeles
Charnessa Warren Ed.D., The University of Chicago
Korey Singleton Ph.D., ATP, RE, George Mason University
Charles Weiner, Esq., The Law Office of Charles Weiner
Location: Governor's Square. 11 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
Join us to learn from and engage with these experienced professionals addressing key developments from the 2024/25 academic year. We will touch upon the most salient and pressing trends in housing accommodations, academic adjustments, evolving student needs, digital accessibility, and campus engagement during 2024-25. This session is valuable for all professional levels seeking to understand current trends and share practical solutions. Participants will leave with concrete strategies from peers facing similar challenges, contributing their own experiences through facilitated discussions and collaborative problem-solving exercises focused on the most pressing issues facing our field today.
1.10: Maximizing UDL Buy-In to Jumpstart Faculty Implementation
Yasminda Choate M.S., M.Ed., Seminole State College
Deanna Miles M.D., Seminole State College
Emily Helft M.Ed., Ed.S., Landmark College Institute for Research and Training
Location: Director's Row H (Plaza Building, Lobby Level)
Engaging faculty in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) can be challenging, especially when it's misperceived as extra work for the benefit of only a few students. In this interactive session, we'll focus on a combination of UDL's 2.0 to 3.0 goal change (spoiler alert--it still benefits both faculty and students!) and share proven strategies for obtaining faculty buy-in to the UDL mindset and motivating them to implement UDL in their courses. In this session, hear from faculty about their own perspectives as well as insights from AHEAD 2024's "Making the Sale: Garnering Buy-In from Faculty for UDL." We'll explore how collaborative communication, interactive professional development, and sensitivity to faculty concerns can bridge the gap between disability professionals and faculty. Through hands-on practice with real-world scenarios, participants will leave with actionable strategies—both what has worked and what hasn’t—that they can apply within their own institutions.
1.11: Accommodation Review Teams: Consistency and Equity for Students; Efficiency and Lower Risk for Staff
Cory Voss M.Ed., University of Idaho
Amy Taylor LMSW, North Idaho Community College
Katelyn Gash B.A, University of Idaho
Julia Gorman M.Ed., Boise State University
Natalie Reiners MC, CRC, Boise State University
Destiny Dranginis B.A., Boise State University
Jeneba Hoene, University of Idaho
Location: Governor's Square 10 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
Have you ever been unsure if the accommodation you are considering for a student is appropriate? Accommodation review teams composed of experienced personnel within the disability office can be a tool to combat uncertainty and increase consistency in accommodation determinations. In this session, three schools will present how they approach gathering group feedback within their offices when considering more complex accommodation determinations. Attendees will gain insights into the criteria considered, the steps involved in the review, and how they ensure that every student’s needs are thoughtfully addressed. Additionally, they will discuss the appeal process for students who seek further clarification or reconsideration of their accommodation decisions, ensuring consistency for internal and external reviews and reducing risk for escalated grievances. Join these institutions to learn how they utilize in-house expertise to support their diverse student bodies!
1.12: Proactive Tools and Strategies for Effective Sign Language Interpreting Services
Latoya Dixon M.Ed, ORCID iD, National Deaf Center
Lauren Kinast Ed.D., National Deaf Center
Kate Lewandowski MS, National Deaf Center
Vanessa Molina, National Deaf Center
Location: Governor's Square 17 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
This interactive session offers a decision-making framework for disability service professionals managing sign language interpreting services for deaf students. Drawing from technical assistance inquiries and campus interactions, presenters will guide participants through a framework to identify evidence-based outcomes and solutions. The model helps participants proactively approach interpreting situations and pivot effectively when necessary. Emphasizing each component of the framework, the session focuses on decision-making for interpreting services. Attendees will leave equipped with tools and resources to provide effective, student-centered services at their institutions.
1.13: Centering Campus and Community Scholarship: the Impact of Disability Studies for Disability Services
Sav Schlauderaff Ph.D., ORCID iD, University of Arizona
Dani Lucchese M.A., University of Arizona
Naty Rico B.A., University of Arizona
Jade Salmon M.A., University of Arizona
Location: Tower Court A (I.M. Pei Building, Second Level)
What role does Disability Studies play in creating a more accessible and inclusive campus? How can we create scholarly and community-centered events on campus with existing resources? These are central questions we will engage with through panel discussion, individual and partner reflection, and group action planning on ways to expand Disability Studies on our campuses. The panelists will discuss Disability Studies initiatives they have co-created over the past 5+ years on their campus as graduate students, disability cultural center and disability resource center staff, and professors. They expanded this work last spring through their inaugural Disability Studies Conference, which highlighted scholarship and art created by 30 campus and local community members, plus over 100 registrants. This session is designed for the panelists to share their own experiences and pull examples from across universities to ultimately identify ways to expand Disability Studies and disability community-focused programming at our institutions.
1.14: Empowering Educators with AI: Enhancing Classroom Learning and Accessibility Services
Mike Sauter, Saddleback College
Brian Trager, National Technical Institute for the Deaf (NTID) at Rochester Institute of Technology
Location: Governor's Square 12 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
How are college faculty and staff leveraging AI to transform classroom learning and support? We will showcase innovative AI applications, from personalized learning experiences to improved accessibility for students with disabilities. We'll examine how AI tools are customizing educational content to meet individual student needs. Additionally, we'll highlight the role of AI-powered chatbots in addressing unique challenges in supporting and teaching students with disabilities. Through interactive discussions, participants will identify their own classroom challenges or opportunities where AI can make a meaningful impact. You'll be introduced to “prompt engineering” — the art of effectively communicating with AI to achieve optimal results.
1.15: Threading the Access Needle: Supporting Disability Inclusion in Professional Graduate Programs
Carleigh Kude, Stanford University School of Medicine
Jessica Kench, University of San Francisco
Daniel Nuss, University of the Pacific
Jon McGough, University of California, San Francisco
Location: Director's Row I (Plaza Building, Lobby Level)
Facilitating access in professional schools requires intentional expertise: in-depth understanding of program competencies, professionalism norms, licensure requirements, and sensitivity to the high stakes relationships between students and their evaluators. Concerns about how accommodation frameworks change between academic and workplace can't be overlooked. This session, comprised of panel storytelling and small group discussion, will highlight novel approaches to supporting professional programs, conducting competency-specific reasonability determination processes, centering disabled student access, and promoting inclusion as a principle that straddles both education and industry. This session is highly recommended for disability professionals working with medicine, law, education, and business administration schools.
1.16: Next LEVEL Accessible Adventures: Planning and Partnering for Off-Campus Leadership and Learning
Kayla Concannon MS, OTR/L, CBIS, Villanova University
Gregory Hannah MA, Villanova University
Connor Hayes BA, Villanova University
Location: Tower Court D (I.M. Pei Building, Second Level)
Accommodations are an educational right, but accessible adventures are what our disabled alums cite as some the most transformative parts of their college journeys. Over the past 15 years, our programming has evolved from exploring our neighborhood, to local daytrips, regional overnights, and weeklong service trips far away. Disability service professionals often go beyond our job descriptions, and “travel agent” might be a surprising challenge. You are the best person at your school to prioritize the health and safety of your students through the logistics of an off-campus itinerary, including transportation, lodging, meals, medication, equipment, partners... and the unexpected. Learn from our stories as we brainstorm your own accessible adventure.
1.17: Research Year in Review: An Overview of Recent Postsecondary Disability Research in 90 Minutes!
Adam Lalor Ph.D., Landmark College
Katherine Aquino Ph.D., St. John's University
Emily Tarconish Ph.D., University of Illinois
Chris Parthemos Ph.D., Virginia Commonwealth University
Rick Bryck Ph.D., Landmark College
Location: Plaza Court 2 + 3 (Plaza Building, Concourse Level)
“I just don’t have time!” This is a response that many members of the Research Knowledge and Practice Community (KPC) hear when we ask our colleagues if they read a recent article on postsecondary disability…and we get it! In an effort to support our AHEAD colleagues, this session will provide a review of the research on disability and postsecondary education from the last year in just 90 minutes! The Research KPC has curated an overview of research articles and will emphasize implications for practice. Attendees will have the opportunities to ask questions of the presenters related to the research.
Back to Top